Another year, another national championship for the Southeastern Conference. Yep, that’s 4 in a row. I’m not an Alabama fan here to boast about the title, I’m actually one of “those people” who happens to be a fan of a different, far less accomplished team in the league who, for the most part, pulls for the rest of the conference when my team isn’t playing. But that's neither here nor their and not the reason I'm writing this post.
After reading the “Maggie Gyllenhaal: The 2009 SEC Football Season” post from a few days ago (give it a read if you haven't yet), I felt it necessary to defend what I believe is STILL the cream of the crop when it comes to college football conferences.
Let me first address the issue of conference pride. I can’t for the life of me understand why the SEC is the only conference that seems to have any semblance of pride between its members. These are the teams you face each and every season and the better they perform on the national stage, the better it looks for your program when you get the chance to come away with a victory in a conference game. Members of the SEC know how tough it is to fight through conference play and it feels good to show the rest of the nation just how tough the battle was. Conference success also helps in recruiting, especially for the bottom feeders in the league as they are able to sell the idea of playing in the best conference in the country. I guess the other conferences don’t chant “Big 10! Big 10! Big 10!” or “Big 12! Big 12! Big 12!” because such chants would be like chanting “We’re #2! We’re #2!”. While that is still respectable, you just don’t do that.
In response to the previous post, comparing an Ole Miss fan celebrating a Bama National Championship, for example, is not comparable to an Orioles fan celebrating a Yankees crown. Why? Because in baseball, strength of schedule doesn’t mean anything. There are no polls, thus perception of the conference, or division in this case, is irrelevant.
Obviously the Southeastern Conference has been on top the last few years as agreed with in the previously mentioned post. But I respectfully disagree with the idea they weren’t the best yet again this year and won’t be for the foreseeable future.
SEC: 6-4 .600
Big 10: 4-3 .571
Big 12: 4-4 .500
ACC: 3-4 .429
What makes this bowl record even more impressive is the fact just about every team from the SEC faced a higher seeded opponent in their respective conference. Here’s a list of the bowl games SEC teams competed in and where each team ranked in their own conference. This was somewhat difficult since some conferences aren’t split up into two divisions but I tried my best. Let’s take a look (winners in bold):
Kentucky (4th in East) vs. Clemson (1st in ACC Atlantic)
Georgia (2nd in East) vs. Texas A&M (5th in Big 12 South)
Tennessee (3rd in East) vs. Va. Tech (2nd in ACC Coastal)
Auburn ( 5th in West) vs. Northwestern (4th in entire Big 10)
LSU (2nd in West) vs. PSU (3rd in entire Big 10)
USC (5th in East) vs. UCONN (5th in entire Big East)
Ole Miss (3rd in West) vs. OK St. (2nd in Big 12 South)
Arkansas (4th in West) vs. ECU (Conf. USA Champs)
Florida (1st in East) vs. Cincinnati (Big East Champ)
And it’s not like Texas put some scrub in the game to take over for McCoy. Although Garrett Gilbert was a freshman, he was still the number 2 quarterback coming out of high school (just behind USC starter Matt Barkley), hardly an excuse. Facing adversity is a part of the game. Deal with it.
For anyone to tell me a conference who won the national championship for the fourth year straight, won another BCS bowl over a conference champion in a rout (Florida by 27 over Cinci), sent the most teams to the postseason, AND arguably had the best bowl performances, is kind of a head scratcher to me.
And to all the other conferences who think the SEC is starting to fall from grace, think again. The conference as a whole is young and if the following list of recruiting ranks doesn’t scream sustained dominance to you, I don’t know what to tell you.